Got wells? Here are your monitoring options.

Right now, there are four ways to monitor your wells. But each leaves something to be desired.

Article · 3 min read

Proactive wellhead integrity monitoring means your engineers can build preventative maintenance plans and better P&A strategies. And that’s a good thing, because it can save your business a lot of money in the long run. Maintenance usually accounts for 10-15% of total production costs, but prescriptive maintenance plans could reduce this cost by as much as 10%.

 

Digital technology can have an enormous influence on optimising maintenance and well integrity monitoring. But, depending on where your wells are in the world, you have to find the right solution that matches your business needs. Right now, there are four ways to monitor your wells. But each leaves something to be desired. 

 

 

Option one: Wired systems

Wired systems are a great, reliable way to monitor your wells, especially if your field is located somewhere with good infrastructure. When you install a wired system, you’ll lay down fibre optic cables. These cables will connect directly to the wellhead and deliver a near-constant stream of data to you. 

 

Wired systems have flaws though. For one, they’re expensive to install. You have to stop production to get the system installed. As in, tens-of-thousands-of-dollars kind-of-expensive. And they’re an enormous pain. Setting up a wired system takes months. You need to halt production. Build out the necessary systems. Train your team. And do a lot of testing.  Plus, your field needs to have access to infrastructure to make the system work. 

 

In all, wired systems are an ideal solution for new, high-producing wells located in areas with good infrastructure. But for more remote wells, or late-life asset management? They’re not a great fit. 

“Diagnostics and monitoring trips are also expensive. Oil companies dedicate large budgets to these integrity monitoring trips, and each trip can cost between $500 and $40,000, depending on the well location, crew size, and type of trip.”

Option two: Cellular monitoring

A more affordable way to monitor your wells is to use existing cellular networks. Cellular monitoring makes use of the existing cell networks that your phone runs on, and generally uses a GSM protocol.

 

The good news about cellular monitoring is that it’s easy to install. If your worksite is located near a cell tower that supports the right frequency that you need, you’ve got access to a great, affordable solution.

 

Cellular networks do have some flaws though, the biggest one being location dependence. Many remote worksites make the mistake of investing in cellular monitoring, but only discover that coverage is spotty, at best. 

 

Option three: Manual monitoring

While wired systems and cellular networks are an excellent way to monitor your wells they aren’t realistic for many wells around the world. Especially ones in remote areas. Or late-life assets that need to be plugged and abandoned. Instead, companies are forced to send engineers out to wells every few weeks (or months) to take diagnostics readings.

 

These trips are dangerous, inefficient, and ineffective. With manual well monitoring, the data is only collected once every few months. This post-hoc data capturing leaves room for massive amounts of risk. The hope with manual monitoring is that engineers can identify well integrity risks before they become dangerous. But with measurements only taken infrequently, there's a risk that the team won’t discover an integrity issue before it’s too late.

 

Diagnostics and monitoring trips are also expensive. Oil companies dedicate large budgets to these integrity monitoring trips, and each trip can cost between $500 and $40,000, depending on the well location, crew size, and type of trip. 

 

Option four: Satellite monitoring

Satellite monitoring is a “dream” monitoring solution. It works anywhere in the world, is generally easy to install, and doesn’t involve complicated wired systems. Satellite systems aren’t affected by bad weather. And they are reliable.

 

But, for years, it’s been too expensive to get connected to a satellite network, or impractical for remote wells. Satellite systems have some serious power requirements. And they generally have a short sensor-to-gateway range of 250 metres, if we’re being generous. Both factors make it impractical for remote monitoring. Plus, sending a lot of data to space isn’t cheap. 

A fifth option?

What if we told you there was a reliable way to get well data with satellite technology, without spending boatloads of cash? Would you believe us?

 

We know. It sounds too good to be true. But, affordable well monitoring in remote areas isn’t science fiction anymore. New digital technology (and some pretty smart people) means there’s a new kid on the block, and it’s called HiberHilo.